Have you ever been confused about when to create a new version of your part or when to add a new revision? Is your company looking for a way to centralize and manage revision control? Managing CAD files is different from managing other types of data for a lot of reasons, and one reason why is the need for both version and revision control. This post will provide a quick overview of why versions and revisions are important and different from each other then suggest some ways to manage them. Versions and revisions sound similar but mean different things. A new version number indicates an update to the file. Revisions are typically designated by adding a suffix to the part number - Part Rev A, for example. For people other than the designer, revisions are typically much more important than versions, since they communicate something about where the part is in the process. Probably the most common use of revisions is to make it clear what version of a part should go to manufacturing. A part is often marked as Revision A the first time it is ready to go to tooling. A revision number appended to the part revision makes that clear. Because a revision reflects a decision by a human i. It typically depends on how the team manages CAD files, which in turn tends to depend on the size of the team. Here are some popular choices with their pros and cons only with respect to version and revision control. If your team has only one or two people, versions and revisions are typically a manual process at the discretion of the engineer. The designer simply adds a version or revision number to the part number or file name. They may store old strategy in a separate folder. As organizations grow they find that they need more complex design and release processes as well as a consistent version and revisioning system. These companies have access to tools that enable the version and revision control they need without the cost and process of more version tools. For example, GrabCAD Workbench tracks each version a user checks in, enables any user to restore a previous version, and allows a user to designate any version as a new revision. Once an organization has dozens of engineers making changes to a CAD model they may invest in a traditional Product Data Management PDM or Product Lifecycle Management PLM system. These systems offer the greatest level of sophistication and control when it comes to versions and revisions. The process that works for a Fortune company would completely crush a small company, while the flexibility of loose revision control that works for a small company would create chaos at a large one. The key to selecting a process and a tool to implement it is to start by understanding your needs. Do I frequently need to allow partners or suppliers to see specific versions or revisions? There are more choices than ever for companies looking for robust CAD revision management. Make sure version you take the time to understand your process and needs before committing to an approach, and make sure the tool you use supports your process. Did we miss any key concerns or options? Did your score surprise you? Let us know in the comments. This guide, written by industry analyst Jim Brown, will help you find the solution that fits your needs. A former MechE turned marketing guy, Rob has worked for a string of successful startups. Before joining GrabCAD as VP of Sales and Marketing Rob led sales and marketing for Backupify, the leading provider of cloud-based backup for SaaS services. Prior to Backupify he spent almost seven years at robotics manufacturer Kiva Systems in a variety of roles including VP Sales, VP Business Development and VP Strategy. Before joining Kiva Rob worked at FreeMarkets, Inc. Rob holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University and a MBA from MIT Sloan School of Management. There are many small companies strategy have few designers and yet they still use PLM. PLM configuration and installing is done by professionals and in most cases I believe the same company that you buy PLM for, does the configuring and installation for you. IT support and maintenance. Cumbersome to end users. These things are specified before configuration starts and very often the people who decide these things are not end-users — designers. Also possible ERP system brings in whole lot of requirements from PLM which makes PLM seem like a clumsy software. Partially this is true, but have to note that if things were done right, this would be a minimal problem. About devices, you can see PLM info and 3D models even in your iPhone today if you want. Same as Workbench I guess. But why not mentioned in PLM pros as well? Of Workbench I would like to know what kind of support it has with ERP? It is said to be limited so Workbench can be connected to ERP? How you define a complex workflow, where the line goes? Ability to make own workflow even in small companies with their Revision system is an important requirement. These things are done by workflows automatically and are not complex, but rather basic stuff. Is that complex or not for Workbench? But at the revision time, almost every PLM customer does in fact pay maintenance on the product, and also pays for IT maintenance — servers, databases and so on. File export makes the file available to a paid user so strategy can be sent to an outside user. Sending a CAD file to someone outside the firewall is a complicated task in and of itself. I agree that almost all PLM packages allow admins to set revisions and control approvals. There are other cloud-based PDM tools that do allow some workflow creation, I believe. Thanks for your careful review of the piece — let me know if you have other control or questions. Regards Bertrand Mezatio TEL: January 6th, By Rob Stevens. Related Articles Five Questions With: GrabCAD Community Member Paul Hammerstrom Checks and Balances: Designing for Additive Manufacturing Have You Tried Workbench Yet? Thank you very much for this valuable article and covering this well. I really enjoyed reading. Few things that I would like to comment: I would appreciate a lot if control Rob or someone else would answer to my questions and thoughts. Thanks for your comments, clearly this is a topic you care a lot about! The simens PLM system sucks. Like what you read? Sign up to recieve our weekly newsletter. Community Library Challenges Questions Tutorials Engineers Workbench Overview Features Compare Print Control Features Resources Blog Resource Center Help Center About us Company Press News Events Jobs. The Computer-Aided Design "CAD" files and all associated content posted to this website are created, uploaded, managed and owned by third party users. Each CAD and any associated text, image or data is in no way sponsored by or affiliated with any company, organization or real-world item, version, or good it may purport to portray.
What is Git - A Quick Introduction to the Git Version Control System
What is Git - A Quick Introduction to the Git Version Control System
Gibson put all the volunteers on a diet that was gluten-free and also free of a group of carbohydrates that he and his colleagues called FODMAP s, an acronym for a series of words that few people will ever remember: fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols.
Translated from the Spanish AMOR PATRIA of Rizal, published on August 20, 1882, in Diariong Tagalog.
Gibson put all the volunteers on a diet that was gluten-free and also free of a group of carbohydrates that he and his colleagues called FODMAP s, an acronym for a series of words that few people will ever remember: fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols.
My name is Vijay Kumar, I am coming from Chittoor, I have completed my B.TECH (mechanical) with 60% in Vemu Enginnering college in Chittoor (A.P).